Top Ten Problems with the GID Diagnosis


Kelley Winters, Ph.D.

GID Reform Advocates


What are the problems with the Gender Identity Disorder diagnosis in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) [1]?  How are overarching issues of psychiatric stigma and access to medical transition procedures related to specific flaws in the diagnostic criteria [2] and supporting text? The philosopher Jiddu Krishnamurti said,


If we can really understand the problem, the answer will come out of it, because the answer is not separate from the problem. [3]


This is my personal list of the most egregious problems with the current Gender Identity Disorder diagnosis. While far from comprehensive, it is perhaps a starting point for dialogue about how harm reduction of gender nomenclature might be possible in the DSM-V.


1.      Focus of pathology on nonconformity to assigned birth sex in disregard to the definition of mental disorder, which comprises distress and impairment.


Recent revisions of the DSM increasingly target gender identity and expression that differ from natal or assigned sex as disordered.  The current diagnostic criteria for GID in the DSM-IV-TR are preoccupied with social gender role nonconformity, especially for children. Identification with the “other sex,” meaning other than assigned birth sex, is described as symptomatic regardless of our satisfaction and happiness with that identification [p.581].


2.      Stigma of mental illness upon emotions and expressions that are ordinary or even exemplary for non-transgender children, adolescents and adults.


Criterion A for Gender Identity Disorder highlights a desire to be treated as, or “frequently passing as,” our affirmed gender as pathological.  For children, criteria A and B stress ordinary masculine or feminine expression in clothing, play, games, toys, and fantasy as symptoms of mental “disturbance” [p.581]. The supporting text disparages innocent childhood play as disorder, including Barbie dolls, playing house, Batman and “rough-and-tumble” activity, if they violate stereotypes of assigned birth sex [pp. 576-577]. Incredulously, knitting is implicated as a focus of sexual perversion for adult transwomen in the supporting text [p.579].


3.      Lacks clarity on gender dysphoria, defined here as clinically significant distress with physical sex characteristics or ascribed gender role [4].


The distress of gender dysphoria that necessitates medical intervention is inadequately described in criterion B of the GID diagnosis in the DSM-IV-TR as “discomfort” or “inappropriateness.”  For children, this often-debilitating pain is obfuscated in the diagnostic criterion, which emphasizes nonconformity to gender stereotypes of assigned birth sex rather than clinically significant distress.  Adolescents and adults who believe that we were “born in the wrong sex” meet criterion B on the basis of their belief, even if our gender dysphoria has been relieved by transition or related medical procedures [p.581].


4.      Contradicts transition and access to hormonal and surgical treatments, which are well proven to relieve distress of gender dysphoria. 


Social role transition, living and passing in our affirmed gender roles, and desiring congruent anatomic sex characteristics are listed as “manifestation” of mental pathology in criterion A of Gender Identity Disorder.  Requests for hormonal or surgical treatment to relieve gender dysphoria are disparaged as “preoccupation” in criterion B and supporting text rather than medical necessity [p. 581].  Evidence of medical transition treatment, such as breast development for transwomen or chest reconstruction for transmen, are described in a negative context as “associated features and disorders” of mental illness in the supporting text [p.579].


5.      Encourages gender-conversion therapies, intended to change or shame one’s gender identity or expression.


The DSM is intended as a diagnostic guide without specific treatment recommendations [p. xxxvii]. Nevertheless, the current GID diagnostic criteria are biased to favor punative gender-conversion “therapies.”   For example, gender variant youth, adolescents or adults who have been shamed into the closet, forced into concealing our inner gender identities, no longer meet the diagnostic criteria of Gender Identity Disorder and are emancipated from a label of mental illness.


6.      Misleading title of  “Gender Identity Disorder,” suggesting that gender identity is itself disordered or deficient.


The name, Gender Identity Disorder, implies “disordered” gender identity — that the inner identities of gender variant individuals are not legitimate but represent perversion, delusion or immature development.   In other words, the current GID diagnosis in the DSM-IV-TR implies that transwomen are nothing more than mentally ill or confused “men” and vice versa for transmen [5].


7.      Maligning terminology, including “autogynephilia,” which disrespects transitioned individuals with inappropriate pronouns and labels.


Maligning language labels gender variant people by our assigned birth sex in disregard of our gender identity.  In other words, affirmed or transitioned transwomen are demeaned as “he” and transmen as “she.”  It appears throughout the diagnostic criteria and supporting text of the GID diagnosis in the current DSM-IV-TR, where affirmed roles are termed “other sex” [p.581], transsexual women are called “males” and “he” [p. 577], and transsexual men as “females” [p. 579].  Such demeaning terms deny our social legitimacy and empower defamatory social stereotypes like “a man in a dress,” in the press, the courts, our workplace and our families. 


8.      False positive diagnosis of those who are no longer gender dysphoric after transition and of gender nonconforming children who were never gender dysphoric.


There is no exit clause in the diagnostic criteria for individuals whose gender dysphoria has been relieved by transition, hormones or surgical treatments, regardless of how happy or well adjusted with our affirmed gender roles.  The diagnosis is implied “to have a chronic course” for adults [p. 580], despite  transition status or absence of distress. Children may be diagnosed with Gender Identity Disorder, solely on the basis of gender role nonconformity, without evidence of gender dysphoria. Criterion A requires only four of five listed attributes, and four of those describe violation of gender stereotypes of assigned birth sex.  The fifth, describing unhappiness with birth sex, is not required to meet criterion A. Criterion B may be met by “aversion toward rough-and-tumble play and rejection of male stereotypical toys…” for natal boys  and “aversion toward normative feminine clothing” for natal girls [p.581].


9.      Conflation of impairment caused by prejudice with distress intrinsic to gender dysphoria.


Criterion D of the GID diagnosis, the clinical significance criterion [p. 581], was intended to require clinically significant distress or impairment to meet the accepted definition of mental disorder [p. xxxi].  Unfortunately, it fails to distinguish intrinsic distress of gender dysphoria from that caused by external societal intolerance.  Lacking clarity in criterion D, prejudice and discrimination can be misconstrued as psychological impairment for gender variant individuals who are not distressed by our physical sex characteristics or ascribed gender roles.


10.  Placement in the class of sexual disorders.


In 1994, Gender Identity Disorders were moved from the class of “Disorders Usually First Evident in Infancy, Childhood or Adolescence,” to the section of sexual disorders in the DSM-IV, renamed “Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders” [6].  This reinforces stereotypes of sexual deviance for gender variant people.


The DSM-V Task Force has an opportunity to address these shortcomings in the current GID diagnosis.  I hope that this list can help provide a way to evaluate proposals for less harmful diagnostic nomenclature in the Fifth Edition of the DSM.



[1] American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 576-582.


[2] DSM-IV-TR Diagnostic criteria for Gender Identity Disorder of Adults and Adolescents are available online at and for children at .


[3] “Krishnamurti Quotes,”


[4] Working definition of Gender dysphoria by Dr. Randall Ehrbar and I, following our panel presentations at the 2007 convention of the American Psychological Association. It is defined in glossary of the DSM-IV-TR as “A persistent aversion toward some of all of those physical characteristics or social roles that connote one’s own biological sex.” (p. 823)


[5] K. Winters, “Gender Dissonance: Diagnostic Reform of Gender Identity Disorder for Adults,” Sexual and Gender Diagnoses of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM),  Ed.  Dan Karasic, MD. and Jack Drescher, MD., Haworth Press, 2005;  co-published in Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, vol. 17 issue 3,  pp. 71-89,  2005.


[6] American Psychiatric Association, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, 1994


Copyright © 2008 Kelley Winters, GID Reform Advocates


About Kelley
Dr. Kelley Winters is a writer and consultant on issues of gender diversity in medical and public policy. She is the author of Gender Madness in American Psychiatry: Essays from the Struggle for Dignity (2008) and a past member of the International Advisory Panel for the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) Standards of Care, the Global Action for Trans* Equality (GATE) Expert Working Group, and the Advisory Boards for TransYouth Family Allies (TYFA). She was recognized in the 2013 Trans 100 Inaugural List for work supporting the transgender community in the US. Kelley has presented papers and presentations on gender policy issues at annual conventions of the American Psychiatric Association, the American Psychological Association, the American Counseling Association and the Association of Women in Psychology. Kelley wanders the highways of America in an old Mazda, ever in search of comfort food.

8 Responses to Top Ten Problems with the GID Diagnosis

  1. Pingback: Top Ten Problems with the GID Diagnosis « bird of paradox

  2. Rev.Dr. Linda Miskimen says:

    The whole issue of Gender Identity Disorder diagnosis and the DSM is junk science absolutly none of the theories, hypothesizes can be proven or duplicated as to “cause” you can not “cure” what you do not understand.

    From the very beginning of humanity sexual practices and sexual taboos have been used by dominant groups in society to keep other subordinate. The APA possess the power to define those who are powerless the transand then impose thier definition on the ones defined. We simply allow this to happen it is time to stand up and ask for truths, not hatred, bigotry, stereotyping and the harm done by those doing the defineing.

  3. I’d like to see the APA take a reality based approach to diagnosis of mental disorders as opposed to the current culturally biased approach. Call me naive but shouldn’t science be based upon reality?

    If a reality based approach were taken it would be clear that having a cross-biological gender identity has more basis in biology than does having a belief in an invisible super being that follows us around and rewards us if we’ve been good, etc. I say remove GID and replace it with religious beliefs that by their nature are oppressive and restrictive of human potential.

  4. Michelle says:

    I say remove GID and replace it with religious beliefs that by their nature are oppressive and restrictive of human potential.

    It’s tempting to play a game of ‘tit for tat’, isn’t it?

    More constructively, we have a careful balance to walk, as there is a legitimate need for the medical and mental health communities to have a lexicon that allows them to understand and describe the clients they are working with.

  5. Pingback: Ten myths about trans people — Global 360@North 44

  6. Pingback: Health Equality: Portland Embraces Transgender Rights – TIME Healthland

  7. Pingback: Health Equality: Portland Embraces Transgender Rights : Eslob Articles

  8. Pingback: Pride Month 2018, Old History, and a New Blog | Trans Policy Reform Blog by Kelley Winters

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: